Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Synthesizer , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Toxic
Meta Performance Analysis
Dusk Rose Reliquary ranks #61 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 15%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Dusk Rose Reliquary is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 55.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Dusk Rose Reliquary has a win rate of 73.3%, making it 3.5% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 20 | 83.1% | 12 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 9 | 82.6% | 5 |
| Kellan, Daring Traveler | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout // Sorcery — Adventure | 12 | 74.7% | 6 |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 5 | 74.0% | 1 |
| Teething Wurmlet | Creature — Wurm | 21 | 69.6% | 10 |
| Overgrown Zealot | Creature — Elf Druid | 6 | 68.8% | 4 |
| Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 27 | 68.5% | 13 |
| Tail Swipe | Instant | 7 | 67.5% | 3 |
| Tough Cookie | Artifact Creature — Food Golem | 22 | 66.4% | 10 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 26 | 65.2% | 11 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Dusk Rose Reliquary than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 1 | 5 | 82.4% | 75.4% | +7.0% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 5 | 76.0% | 74.3% | +1.7% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 6 | 76.0% | 74.4% | +1.6% |
| Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 6 | 73.3% | 73.3% | +0.1% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 6 | 74.4% | 75.5% | -1.1% |
| Brightglass Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 4 | 7 | 73.3% | 75.6% | -2.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | 68 | 26.9% | 44.8% |
| Azorius Glyph | 33 | 28.7% | 31.3% |
| Selesnya Artifacts | 21 | 100.0% | 71.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 10 | 2.8% | 37.7% |
| Azorius Flash | 10 | 4.4% | 55.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.